The need for a global health ethic.
نویسندگان
چکیده
e37 www.thelancet.com Vol 386 November 14, 2015 In the 1940s, the renowned Wisconsin, USA, conservationist Aldo Leopold wrote “The Land Ethic” as the culmination of his now celebrated work, A Sand County Almanac. In his essay, Leop old articulated the need for, and the ethical basis of, a new relationship between people and the land. He imagined the awakening of an ecological conscience that redefi nes humanity as part of nature, rather than its external conqueror. The dire conservation challenges he observed—soil erosion, water pollution, and wildlife loss—required solutions based not merely on ecological expediency, but on ethical conviction. “That land is a community is the basic concept of ecology,” he wrote, “but that land is to be loved and respected is an extension of ethics”. We posit that Leopold’s vision for the land can and should be extended to global health. Like the The need for a global health ethic immediately explore the potential synergies between the Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of NCDs, the Sustainable Development Goals, and eff orts to close the nutrition divide manifested in the triple burden of malnutrition; all within the Earth’s critical and non-negotiable planetary boundaries. Comitigation policies need to build in health and ecosystem externalities through appropriate and progressive pricing mechanisms; protect freshwater resources; tackle and reduce food waste; invest in scalable plans and fi nancing models for implementing renewable energies, emphasising the potential indirect health gains through lower rates of pollution-related disease; and encourage regional investment in urban active transport infrastructure which benefi ts both the cardiovascular health of populations and environmental health. These are just some of the examples of win–win policies that must be fought for, from all sides. Achieving these goals will be crucial, but powerful corporate and political interests exist that have the potential to impede progress. With this in mind, we must forge and grow new partnerships for action. Linking health and environmental sustainability across science, business, politics, and civil society, the EAT Initiative strives to do just this. A multistakeholder platform that uses food as a vector for change, EAT identifi es and exploits common solutions to these global challenges and aims to realise a sustainable food system for all. We commend the report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission and call on the global community to focus on synergies between human and planetary health. Communities, leaders, scientists, and advocates from both sides must align thinking, language, and points of action. Ours is a shared agenda and the stakes could not be higher. These risks to both human and planetary health are issues we, as humanity, have created and therefore can and must solve. The future health of our planet, and our populations, depends on it.
منابع مشابه
AN INTRODUCTION TO THE THOUGHT OF TEILHARD DE CHARDIN AS A CATALYST FOR INTERRELIGIOUS DIALOGUE
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, as he is more commonly known, was a Jesuit priest who died in 1955, having worked for some twenty years as a paleontologist in China. While being a renowned scientist, who assisted in the finding of the Peking Man fossil, Teilhard’s main desire and scholastic efforts were to reshape modern Christian theology in the light of contemporary science, especially in his own...
متن کاملEvidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Universal Health Coverage: Broadening the Scope; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”
Universal health coverage (UHC) is high on the global health agenda, and priority setting is fundamental to the fair and efficient pursuit of this goal. In a recent editorial, Rob Baltussen and colleagues point to the need to go beyond evidence on cost-effectiveness and call for evidence-informed deliberative processes when setting priorities for UHC. Such processes are crucial at every step on...
متن کاملAdvancing Global Health – The Need for (Better) Social Science; Comment on “Navigating Between Stealth Advocacy and Unconscious Dogmatism: The Challenge of Researching the Norms, Politics and Power of Global Health”
In his perspective “Navigating between stealth advocacy and unconscious dogmatism: the challenge of researching the norms, politics and power of global health,” Ooms argues that actions taken in the field of global health are dependent not only on available resources, but on the normative premise that guides how these resources are spent. This comment sets out how the application of a predomina...
متن کاملGlobal Health in the Anthropocene: Moving Beyond Resilience and Capitalism; Comment on “Health Promotion in an Age of Normative Equity and Rampant Inequality”
There has been much reflection on the need for a new understanding of global health and the urgency of a paradigm shift to address global health issues. A crucial question is whether this is still possible in current modes of global governance based on capitalist values. Four reflections are provided. (1) Ecological–centered values must become central in any future global health framework. (2) ...
متن کاملOpening the Policy Window to Mobilize Action Against Corruption in the Health Sector; Comment on “We Need to Talk About Corruption in Health Systems”
Corruption in the health sector has been a “dirty secret” in the health policy and international development community, but recent global activities point to a day when it will no longer be neglected as a key determinant of health. To further explore next steps forward, this commentary applies the Kingdon’s multiple-streams framework (MSF) to assess what opportunities are available to mobilize ...
متن کاملPolitics or Technocracy – What Next for Global Health?; Comment on “Navigating Between Stealth Advocacy and Unconscious Dogmatism: The Challenge of Researching the Norms, Politics and Power of Global Health”
Politics play a central part in determining health and development outcomes as Gorik Ooms highlights in his recent commentary. As health becomes more global and more politicized the need grows to better understand the inherently political processes at all levels of governance, such as ideological positions, ideas, value judgments, and power. I agree that global health research should strengthen...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Lancet
دوره 386 10007 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015